- Select a DNP project that uses both quantitative and qualitative methods to summarize the results from the options provided.
- Review the required Learning Resources regarding how to summarize results.
- Consider how the findings reflect the practice-focused question in the selected project.
The Assignment
Critique a DNP project that used both quantitative and qualitative methods and summarize the results.
Link the results of both quantitative and qualitative findings to the practice-focused question in the DNP project.
By Day 7 of Week 10
Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 10.
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
- To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK10Assgn_LastName_
FirstInitial - Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
- Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
NURS_8211_Week10_Assignment_
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
|
Critiqued the results of the quantitative methods used in the selected DNP project.
|
34to >29.0 ptsExcellentThe response comprehensively and clearly explains the global initiative. The response comprehensively and clearly indicates how global initiative impacts the nursing profession.
29to >27.0 ptsGoodThe response clearly explains the global initiative. The response clearly indicates how global initiative impacts the nursing profession.
27to >26.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains the global initiative. The response inaccurately or vaguely indicates how global initiative impacts the nursing profession.
26to >0 ptsPoorThe response vaguely or inaccurately explains the global initiative, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not indicate how global initiative impacts the nursing profession, or it is missing.
|
34 pts
|
|
Critiqued the results of the quantitative methods used in the selected DNP project.
|
34to >29.0 ptsExcellentThe response comprehensively and clearly describes the patient care delivery gap or problem. The response comprehensively and clearly includes metrics and data for support.
29to >27.0 ptsGoodThe response clearly describes the patient care delivery gap or problem. The response clearly includes metrics and data for support.
27to >26.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely describes the patient care delivery gap or problem. The response inaccurately or vaguely includes metrics and data for support.
26to >0 ptsPoorThe response vaguely or inaccurately describes the patient care delivery gap or problem, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague metrics and data, or it is missing.
|
34 pts
|
|
Summarized results of the qualitative methods used in a selected DNP project.
|
34to >29.0 ptsExcellentThe response comprehensively and clearly describes the gap or problem by addressing the type of indicators. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the identification.
29to >27.0 ptsGoodThe response clearly describes the gap or problem by addressing the type of indicators. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the identification.
27to >26.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely describes the gap or problem by addressing the type of indicators. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the identification.
26to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely describes the gap or problem by addressing the type of indicators, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the identification, or it is missing.
|
34 pts
|
|
Summarized results of the quantitative methods used in a selected DNP project.
|
34to >29.0 ptsExcellentThe response comprehensively and clearly describes the gap or problem by describing whether the quality indicator is risk adjusted. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the description.
29to >27.0 ptsGoodThe response clearly describes the gap or problem by describing whether the quality indicator is risk adjusted. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the description.
27to >26.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely describes the gap or problem by describing whether the quality indicator is risk adjusted. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the description.
26to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely describes the gap or problem by describing whether the quality indicator is risk adjusted, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the description, or it is missing.
|
34 pts
|
|
Identified the connection between the results of the findings and the practice-focused questions in the DNP project.
|
34to >29.0 ptsExcellentThe response comprehensively and clearly describes the gap or problem by explaining how the selected organization might establish their target or benchmark metrics. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the description.
29to >27.0 ptsGoodThe response clearly describes the gap or problem by explaining how the selected organization might establish their target or benchmark metrics. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the description.
27to >26.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely describes the gap or problem by explaining how the selected organization might establish their target or benchmark metrics. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the description.
26to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely describes the gap or problem by explaining how the selected organization might establish their target or benchmark metrics, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the description, or it is missing.
|
34 pts
|
|
Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
|
10to >8.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.
8to >7.0 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
7to >6.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.
6to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
|
10 pts
|
|
Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
|
10to >8.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
8to >7.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
7to >6.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
6to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
|
10 pts
|
|
Written Expression and Formatting—The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
|
10to >8.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors.
8to >7.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.
7to >6.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.
6to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
|
10 pts
|
Total Points: 200
